Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2022; 14(9): 918-929
Published online Sep 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i9.918
Table 2 The characteristics of the lesions treated by various methods of endoscopic resection
Variable
STER
EFTR
ESD
Tumor diameter, n (%)
< 30 mm23 (52.3)10 (71.4)23 (71.9)
≥ 30 mm21 (47.7)4 (28.6)9 (28.1)
Location, n (%)
Esophagocardia19 (43.2)0 (0.0)6 (18.8)
Cardia18 (40.9)2 (14.3)6 (18.8)
Gastrocardia7 (15.9)12 (85.7)20 (62.4)
Shapes of lesion, n (%)
Regular16 (36.4)11 (78.6)20 (62.5)
Irregular28 (63.6)3 (21.4)12 (37.5)
Growth pattern, n (%)
Predominant extraluminal6 (13.6)11 (78.6)0 (0.0)
Predominant intracavitary38 (86.4)3 (21.4)32 (100.0)
Histopathology, n (%)
Leiomyoma42 (95.4)4 (28.6)25 (78.1)
GIST1 (2.3)10 (71.4)7 (21.9)
Schwannoma1 (2.3)0 (0.00)0 (0.0)
Operation time, median (range), min 50 (18–126)55 (23–108)36 (16–116)
En bloc resection, n (%)34 (77.3)13 (92.9)29 (90.6)
Intraoperative bleeding, n (%)
Bleeding group8 (18.2)3 (21.4)6 (18.8)
No bleeding group36 (81.8)11 (78.6)26 (81.3)