Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2021; 13(8): 848-858
Published online Aug 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i8.848
Table 2 Comparison of Image characteristics among common splenic tumor

Tumor
Tumor shape, features, and characteristics
MRI T1
MRI T2
CT/MRI enhancing pattern
Other image characteristics probably aid diagnosis
BenignSANTWell-circumscribed, commonly lobulated, solitary massIso-hypointenseHypointenseSpoke-Wheel pattern; Poor enhancementPET/CT: Low FDG accumulation
HemangiomaSingle nodule; multiple nodules; diffuse masses enlarging the spleenHypointenseHyperintenseHomogenous or peripheral enhancementMostly small, asymptomatic, and slow growth
CystCystic lesionHypointenseHyperintenseNo enhancementUltrasound: Thin wall, anechoic, peripheral brightly echogenicity, and distal shadows due to wall calcification
MalignantSystemic lymphomaHomogenous splenomegaly; Infiltrative miliary lesions (1-5 mm); Multifocal lesions (2-10 cm); Uncommon solitary lesions (7-14 cm)IsointenseHypointensePoor enhancingSplenomegaly; Splenic infarct; PET: Intense heterogenous FDG activity; Extra-splenic findings: Hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy
Primary splenic lymphomaSolitary mass > uncommonly SplenomegalyIsointenseHypointensePoor enhancingCentral necrosis
MetastasisVariouslyIso-hypointenseHyperintensitySimilar to the primary tumorPET/CT: FDG-avid tumor; Poorly marginated; Heterogenous