Patients with Clostridium difficile infection and prior appendectomy may be prone to worse outcomes

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1436

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 11

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3021)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

193

WORD

111

HTML

1463

Figures (1-2)

223

Tables (1-6)

129

Sum=2119

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

379

Download

523

Sum=902

Nov 27, 2021 (publication date) through Apr 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1436-1447
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1436

Table 3 Comparison of the Clostridium difficile infection outcomes based on the prior appendectomy status and the inverse probability of treatment weights analysis

Outcome	Total	No prior appendectomy	Prior appendectomy	OR (95%CI)	P value
n	1580	1382	198
n IP-weighted		1572	1354
Mortality
n (%)	220 (13.9)	193 (14.2)	27 (13.7)	0.97 (0.61-1.47)	0.877
n IP-weighted (%)		218 (14)	207 (15.5)	1.12 (0.65-1.92)	0.685
Recurrence
n (%)	228 (14.4)	199 (14.4)	29 (14.6)	1.02 (0.66-1.54)	0.915
n IP-weighted (%)		228 (14.5)	204 (15.1)	1.05 (0.66-1.67)	0.847
Toxic megacolon
n (%)	7 (0.4)	4 (0.34)	3 (1.57)	4.75 (0.87-22.9)	0.069
n IP-weighted (%)		5 (0.3)	19 (1.5)	4.32 (0.91-20.57)	0.066
Colectomy
n (%)	22 (1.4)	16 (1.19)	6 (3.06)	2.65 (0.93-6.59)	0.067
n IP-weighted (%)		18 (1.2)	24 (1.8)	1.53 (0.55-4.27)	0.413
Severity (IDSA)
Before IPTW				1.32 (1.01-1.75)	0.043
Mild, n (%)	710 (44.9)	634 (45.9)	76 (38.4)
Severe, n (%)	566 (35.8)	489 (35.4)	77 (38.9)
Fulminant, n (%)	304 (19.2)	259 (18.7)	45 (22.7)
After IPTW				1.59 (1.15-2.18)	0.005
Mild, n (%)		724 (46.1)	472 (34.8)
Severe, n (%)		557 (35.4)	526 (38.8)
Fulminant, n (%)		291 (18.5)	356 (26.3)
LOS among survivors
Median (IQR)		9 (5.00; 18.0)	10 (6.50; 20.0)	1.1 (0.94-1.28)	0.233
Median (IQR)-IPTW		10 (5.00; 20.0)	12 (7.00; 23.00)	0.9 (0.74-1.1)	0.318

Data were summarized using counts and percentages before inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW) and weighed counts and percentages after IPTW. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression for categorical variables and Poisson regression for length of stay (LOS). Analysis for LOS included only patients who were discharged. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess the association between history of appendectomy and Infectious Diseases Society of America severity. CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; IQR: Interquartile range; IPTW: Inverse probability of treatment weights; LOS: Length of stay; IDSA: Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Citation: Shaikh DH, Patel H, Munshi R, Sun H, Mehershahi S, Baiomi A, Alemam A, Pirzada U, Nawaz I, Naher K, Hanumanthu S, Nayudu S. Patients with Clostridium difficile infection and prior appendectomy may be prone to worse outcomes. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(11): 1436-1447
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i11/1436.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1436