Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Apr 27, 2019; 11(4): 198-217
Published online Apr 27, 2019. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i4.198
Table 2 Peer-reviewed literature reports on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing endoscopic transluminal necrosectomy
Author/year/countryRef.No. of patientsModalityComplicationsOverall successrate (%)Mortality
Jones/2016/United States[123]69ETNN/AN/A6.5%
Oh/2016/Japan[134]25ETN20% (5/24), 4 self-limited abdominal pain, 1 minor bleeding100% pain score improvement, p = 0.001N/A
Sharaiha/2016/United States[135]124ETNSuprainfection n = 3, stent occlusion n = 2, stent migration n = 4, hemorrhage n = 1N/A0%
Huggett/2015/United Kingdom[136]19ETNStent migration after necrosectomy 2/19, abdominal pain 1/19N/A26%
Schmidt/2015/Denmark[137]81ETNDeath 1 (1%), bleeding from necrosis cavity 4 (5%), bleeding from transmural tract 4 (5%), pneumoperitoneum 4 (5%)N/A11%
Smoczyńsk/2016/Poland[138]56ETNTransmural stent displacement n = 11, GI perforation n = 11N/A0%
Siddiqui/2015/United States[139]68ETNInfection n = 4, bleeding n = 5N/A0%
Kumar/2014/United States[103]24ETN0/12 vs 8/12 (bleeding, enterocutaneous fistula and infection)N/A0
Smith/2014/United States[140]17ETNBleeding n = 1, sepsis n = 1N/A5.8%
Saxena/2014/United States[141]5ETNPseudocyst n = 1, stent displacement n = 1N/A0%
Rische/2013/Germany[142]31ETNPerforation of colon (n = 2); stent dislocation to jejunum (n = a), bleeding (n = 1)83%9.6%
Siddiqui/2013/United States[143]14ETN3/14 (perforation, pneumoperitonum, bacteremia)N/A7.1%
Ardengh/2013/Brazil[144]15ETN4 patients experienced bleeding (entry side (n = 3), inside cavity (n = 1), and worsening of infection (33.3%)N/A13.3%
Yasuda/2013/Japan[145]57ETNBleeding (n = 5), perforation (n = 3), air embolism (n = 1)75%11%
Gardner/2011/United States[116]104ETN14/104 (Bacteremia, infected collection, moderate bleeding at puncture site, C. diff colitis, retrogastric perforation × 2, pneumoperitoneum × 3, balloon dilatation in retroperitoneum, massive bleeding during dilatation, periprocedural hypotension and cardiac arrest, anoxic brain injury, PEG site infection. bleeding (19/104)N/A5.7%
Varadarajulu/2011/United States[146]60ETN5/60N/A5%
Becker/2009/Germany[129]7ETNSpontaneous duodenal perforation (1/7), pancreatico-colonic fistula (1/7), fistula to the retroperitoneal space (1/7), spontaneous gastric bleeding (1/7), exocrine insufficiency (2/7)N/A0
Seifert/2009/Germany[22]93ETNPseudocyst n = 11, bleeding n = 13, perforation n = 5, fistula n = 2, air embolism n = 2, multiorgan failure n = 280% Fairly satisfied15.5%
Mathew/2008/United States[95]6ETNN/A100%N/A
Voermans/2007/The Netherlands[147]25ETN7/25 (bleeding). 1/25 (perforation of wall)N/A0
Schrover/2007/The Netherlands[148]8ETNBleeding n = 1N/A12.5%
Charnley/2006/United Kingdom[149]13ETNN/AN/A15.3%
Bakker/2005/The Netherlands[100]20ETNNew-onset diabetes 2 (22%)1 3 (50%)2, use of pancreatic enzymes 0 (0%)1, 3 (50%)2 persisting fluid collections 2 (22%)1 3 (50%)2, pancreatic fistula 1 (10%)1 7 (70%)2, enterocutaneous fistula 0 (0%)1 2 (20%)1, new-onset multiple organ failure 5 (50%)1 0 (0%)2N/A10%