Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2026; 17(6): 118576
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.118576
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.118576
Table 2 Proposed minimum reporting set for standardized quantitative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in diabetic foot ulcer anterolateral thigh free-flap reconstruction
| Reporting domain | Minimum items to report (recommended) | Why it matters | Outcome anchoring |
| Patient and limb ischemia phenotype | Diabetes duration/type; PAD history; prior revascularization (type, timing); ulcer location/angiosome; infection status | Baseline heterogeneity strongly shapes perfusion signals and failure risk | Stratify analyses by ischemia phenotype and revascularization status |
| Distal perfusion capacity (pre-op baseline) | Toe pressure/TBI, SPP, TcPO2 (site, temperature settings, timing); Doppler waveform | Interprets ICG-FA within a “distal capacity ceiling”; mitigates ABI distortion in medial calcification | Use clinically meaningful thresholds and report proportion meeting targets |
| ICG agent and administration | ICG dose (mg/kg), concentration, injection rate/flush volume, injection site, repeat-injection interval | Dose/rate substantially change curve shape and saturation; critical for reproducibility | Report adverse reactions; document repeated runs and reasons |
| Imaging system and acquisition settings | Device model; excitation/emission band; working distance; gain/exposure; frame rate; ambient light control; start time relative to injection | Controls systematic measurement drift across platforms and cases | Provide calibration/QA steps if available |
| ROI definition rules | ROI anatomical landmarks; size/shape; number of ROIs (central vs peripheral, suspected hypoperfusion zones); method for background subtraction | ROI selection is a dominant source of between-study variability | Predefine ROI plan; avoid “post-hoc ROI fishing” |
| Primary kinetic parameters (FTC-based) | Wash-in slope; Tmax; AUC; Fmax; time-to-10%/90% rise (if used); normalization method | Kinetic metrics are less sensitive than intensity-only metrics and reflect inflow/exchange dynamics | Specify how curves are extracted (software, smoothing, interpolation) |
| Decision rules during surgery | Criteria for margin trimming, re-anastomosis, supercharging, warming/vasodilator use; whether decisions were blinded to kinetics | Enables evaluation of clinical utility and prevents circular reasoning | Link each decision to subsequent necrosis/complication endpoints |
| Systemic physiology at imaging | MAP/vasopressors; temperature; hemoglobin; SpO2/PaO2; PaCO2/ventilation strategy; fluid balance | ICG-FA reflects a systemic-regional-microcirculatory continuum; systemic variables confound kinetics | Report concurrent systemic targets and deviations |
| Comparator modalities (if available) | NIRS StO2 trends; TcPO2/TcPCO2; LDF/LSCI; thermography | Multimodal validation improves credibility and mechanistic inference | Predefine primary/secondary validation endpoints |
| Clinical endpoints | Partial/total flap necrosis (definition, timing); take-back/re-exploration; wound healing time; limb salvage; LOS | Avoids endpoint heterogeneity, enabling meta-analysis/registry utility | Mandatory follow-up window and adjudication process |
- Citation: Lu PY, Hao ZY, Xing GW, Zhang PF, Liu YS, Li WY, Xu MJ. Improving intraoperative perfusion reliability in anterolateral thigh free flap reconstruction for diabetic foot ulcers. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(6): 118576
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v17/i6/118576.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.118576