BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2026; 17(10): 123286
Published online Oct 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.123286
Table 7 Summary of methodological considerations
Methodological considerations: Isolation method
Advantages
Limitations
Recommendation
Synthetic insight: PDN-specific consideration
Differential ultracentrifugationReference standard; widely usedCo-pellets aggregates, lipoproteins, other vesicle subtypes; operator-dependentRequires standardized protocols (rotor type, g-force, time)Most widely used in PDN biomarker studies to date, enabling cross-study comparison; however, co-pelleting of lipoproteins is a particular concern in diabetic patients, who frequently have dyslipidemia that elevates plasma lipoprotein levels
Size exclusion chromatographySuperior purity; maintains vesicle integrityReduced yield; requires specialized equipmentSuitable for protein biomarker studiesPreferred for NfL and protein biomarker studies in PDN given superior removal of lipoprotein contamination; recommended when exosomal protein rather than miRNA cargo is the primary analytical target
Polymer-based precipitationSimple; scalableSubstantial non-vesicular contamination (protein aggregates, lipoproteins)Caution advised for protein cargo analysisParticularly unreliable in diabetic plasma due to elevated lipoprotein and acute-phase protein levels; not recommended for PDN biomarker discovery or validation studies
Immunoaffinity captureHigh specificity for vesicle subpopulationsRequires validated antibodies; limited by incomplete knowledge of surface proteomesPreferred for cell-type-specific exosome analysisCritical enabling technology for PDN specificity: L1CAM capture for neuronal and MOG capture for Schwann cell-derived exosomes directly addresses the neural-signal dilution problem in plasma and is the recommended approach for PDN biomarker validation cohorts


Write to the Help Desk