BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jan 15, 2026; 17(1): 110502
Published online Jan 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v17.i1.110502
Table 2 Summary of urinary tubular biomarkers important in the diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease
Biomarker
Source
Diagnostic accuracy
Clinical significance
Validation status
Prospective
Contras
NGALProximal and distal tubular stress injuryAUC: 0.88 (0.84-0.90); sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.81[57]Early marker of tubular injury; predictive of nephropathy before albuminuriaLarger-scale, standardized prospective studies are needed to implement uNGAL as a biomarker into routine clinical useDetects injury before traditional biomarkers; non-invasive and stable in urineNot specific for DKD; elevated in infections or AKI; limited validation (small sample size studies only, high heterogeneity among studies in terms of results and methodologies)
KIM-1Proximal tubular injuryAUC: 0.85 (0.82-0.88); sensitivity 0.68, specificity 0.83[58]Sensitive marker of early tubular injury in DKD; correlates with disease progressionSome promising data, but whether it can be used as a new marker for diagnosing DKD needs further investigationHighly specific for proximal tubular damage; FDA-qualified for nephrotoxicityLimited data in T1DM; limited validation (high heterogeneity between studies in terms of results and methodologies)
L-FABPLipid metabolism and proximal tubular stressAUC: 0.97 (0.94-1.00); sensitivity 100%, specificity 86.67%[59]Reflects oxidative and lipid-induced tubular damageAvailable research seems to highlight high predictive power even compared to other urinary markers including microalbuminuria, but more studies are necessary in order to validate it as a standard biomarkerSensitive to oxidative stress and useful for early diagnosisAffected by diet and comorbidities (false positives); requires special assays; limited validation (small sample size studies only, high heterogeneity among studies in terms of results and methodologies)
MCP-1Inflammatory chemokine secreted by monocytes and macrophagesAUC: 0.546 (0.453-0.638); sensitivity 67.3%, specificity 50.0%[60]Correlates with tubulointerstitial inflammation and progression of DKDMay not be sufficient as a standalone diagnostic marker for DKDCorrelates with inflammation and disease activity; useful in prognosisModerate sensitivity; poor-to-fair discrimination. Levels can fluctuate widely depending on the extent of kidney damage and the presence of inflammatory stimuli
Cystatin CProximal tubular functionAUC: 0.807 (0.741-0.873) sensitivity, 70.9%; specificity, 86.3%[61,62]Indicates proximal tubular dysfunction; used in conjunction with serum cystatin CAlthough not specifically approved as a stand-alone biomarker for DKD, it is well recognized as a valuable marker of kidney function and for assessment of overall kidney health, including in the context of DKDNon-invasive, standardized assays availableAffected by inflammation, corticosteroids, thyroid dysfunction and infections (false positives); not highly specific
CreatinineMuscle metabolism and tubular functionAUC: 0.604-0.8[63]Used to normalize other urinary biomarkers; reflects kidney filtration but not specificLimited diagnostic value alone; rarely used; not FDA approvedReadily available, useful for comparative purposesNot specific or sensitive for kidney damage (it reflects filtration rather than damage); limited diagnostic value alone
Fe MgTubular magnesium handlingNo data on AUC, sensitivity, or specificityEarly sign of tubular reabsorption impairmentMay not be sufficient and specific as a diagnostic biomarker of DKDPotential early tubular dysfunction marker; measurable in clinical laboratoriesLack of standardization, diagnostic accuracy data, and large-scale validation (limited sample sizes, no established cut-offs)
AngiotensinogenRAAS activityNo data on AUC, sensitivity, or specificityReflects intrarenal RAAS activity; elevated in DKD and hypertensionuAGT remains a candidate “theragnostic” biomarker predicting response to RAAS inhibition; further rigorous studies are needed to determine its potential diagnostic role in DKDCorrelates with DKD severity; reflects RAAS dysregulationValues can be influenced by sex hormones (false positives). Overlap with systemic RAAS activation; requires careful interpretation. Lack of external validation (lack of diagnostic accuracy data, small sample size studies)
PeriostinTubular fibrosisAUC: 0.78 (0.71-0.86); sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 43.3% (for a cut-off value of 1.01 ng/mg Cr)[64]Associated with tubular injury and fibrosis; elevated in early DKDStill sparse, although consistent body of research regarding its role as an early biomarker of DKDReflects fibrotic transformation early; may guide interventionsEmerging marker; limited clinical validation and availability (small and cross-sectional studies). Role not clear in early DKD
UromodulinThick ascending limb healthRegarding the ability to discriminate between patients with DKD and patients with CKD without diabetes, AUC-ROC for the urinary glycated uromodulin (glcUMOD) resulted in 0.715 (0.597-0.834)[65]; urinary uromodulin with an AUC of 0.81 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 60%) and exosomal UMOD gene expression with an AUC of 0.95 (sensitivity 92%, specificity 84%) are elevated in early DKD[66]Lower levels associated with increased mortality risk and DKD progressionglcUMOD could represent a novel biomarker for DKD; determination of the clinical value of glcUMOD requires further studyInverse association with outcomes; not expressed in damage; potentially protective markerNot a direct damage marker; interpretation depends on clinical context; the limited research has focused on its translational modification (glcUMOD)
EGFTubular epithelial regenerationRegarding the association between lower uEGF to creatinine ratio with new-onset eGFR < 60 mL/minute per 1.73 m2: In T2DM normoalbuminuric patients: AUC-ROC: 0.85 (0.81-0.90)[67] Involved in tubular repairLow uEGF to creatinine ratio could serve as a biomarker of progressive renal function deterioration in normoalbuminuric patientsInverse marker (lower levels predict DKD progression); decreases before clinical deteriorationNot routinely measured, lack of sufficient validation
VDBPVitamin D transport, liver and tubular cellsNo data on AUC, sensitivity, or specificity. Significantly elevated in diabetics with normal, micro- and macroalbuminuria compared to controls, in stepwise fashion (SMDs: 1.52, 1.81, and 1.51, respectively; all P < 0.00001)[68]Elevated in DKD; correlates with albuminuria and tubular injuryuVDBP could be a promising tubular injury biomarker but requires formal accuracy studies on larger scaleStrong correlation with DKD progression; measurable with multiplex assaysLack of specificity; also elevated in other renal pathologies (false positives); lack of diagnostic accuracy data and established cut-offs
RBP4Tubular stress, adipocytesAUC: 0.746 (0.659-0.834), sensitivity 84.6%, specificity 62.5%[69]Associated with tubular stress and insulin resistance in DKDPredictive role of urinary RBP4 requires further investigation, with most studies involving circulating/serum RBP4Associated with metabolic stress and insulin resistance; useful in early DKDLimited normative data; influenced by obesity (false positives); it may be complementary in the diagnosis of early DKD
YKL-40Inflammation and remodeling (monocytes and chondrocytes)It seems associated with a greater risk of kidney function decline and mortality on a limited male cohort[70]Elevated in DKD; linked to mortality and inflammationSerum/plasma YKL-40 predictive power of early DKD has been validated by multiple studiesRise relevant in DKDEmerging marker, lacks widespread validation


Write to the Help Desk