Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Aug 15, 2025; 16(8): 108245
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108245
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108245
Table 6 Comparison of renal function indexes between diabetic nephropathy group and control group
Variables | DN group (n = 167) | Control group (n = 85) | t | P value |
eGFR (mL/minute) | 79.67 ± 8.77 | 115.22 ± 10.17 | -27.163 | 0.000 |
Cys-C (mg/L) | 5.98 ± 2.57 | 3.80 ± 0.98 | 7.554 | 0.000 |
Scr (μmol/L) | 95.48 ± 16.27 | 66.81 ± 11.51 | 14.494 | 0.000 |
BUN (mmol/L) | 8.60 ± 2.36 | 6.56 ± 1.71 | 7.108 | 0.000 |
ACR (mg/g) | 289.93 ± 105.69 | 160.73 ± 33.62 | 10.982 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Shi YP, Pan ZL, Zhang J, Xue LY, Li MQ. Gut dysbiosis, low-grade inflammation, and renal impairment severity in elderly diabetic nephropathy. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(8): 108245
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i8/108245.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108245