Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Aug 15, 2025; 16(8): 108245
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108245
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108245
Table 12 Comparison of changes in renal function indicators between the progressive group and the stable group
| Variables | Progress group (n = 118) | Stable group (n = 134) | t | P value |
| eGFR (mL/minute) | 7.02 ± 1.10 | 2.65 ± 1.43 | -13.235 | 0.000 |
| Cys-C (mg/L) | -0.98 ± 0.86 | 0.44 ± 0.81 | -14.554 | 0.000 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | -13.13 ± 10.27 | 5.17 ± 9.65 | -16.448 | 0.000 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | -1.62 ± 1.19 | 0.83 ± 1.16 | -13.621 | 0.000 |
| ACR (mg/g) | -61.04 ± 53.67 | 24.66 ± 46.82 | 27.248 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Shi YP, Pan ZL, Zhang J, Xue LY, Li MQ. Gut dysbiosis, low-grade inflammation, and renal impairment severity in elderly diabetic nephropathy. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(8): 108245
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i8/108245.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.108245