Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Jul 15, 2025; 16(7): 107335
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107335
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107335
Ref. | Country | Design | Patient number | Mean age (years) | Male (%) | Baseline HbA1c (%) | T2D duration (years) | Concurrent antidiabetic treatment | Intervention | Control | Treatment duration (weeks) | Outcomes reported |
Inagaki et al[22]; 100 mg | Japan | R, DB, PC | 111 | 57.7 | 71.2 | 8 | NR | None | Canagliflozin, 100 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-β |
Inagaki et al[22]; 300 mg | Japan | R, DB, PC | 113 | 57.3 | 72.6 | 8.1 | NR | None | Canagliflozin, 300 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-β |
Jabbour et al[41]1 | 6 countries | R, DB, PC | 447 | 54.9 | 54.8 | 8 | 5.7 | Sitagliptin ± metformin | Dapagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-IR |
Kaku et al[23] | Japan | R, DB, PC | 114 | 56.7 | 66.7 | 8.4 | 6.2 | None | Tofogliflozin, 20 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Seino et al[42]; 2.5 mg | Japan | R, DB, PC | 86 | 58.1 | 62.5 | 8.1 | 6.5 | None | Luseogliflozin, 2.5 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Seino et al[42]; 5 mg | Japan | R, DB, PC | 87 | 57 | 72.7 | 8.1 | 6.2 | None | Luseogliflozin, 5 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Seino et al[24]; 2.5 mg | Japan | R, DB, PC | 85 | 57.3 | 69.4 | 8 | 4.8 | None | Luseogliflozin, 2.5 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Seino et al[24]; 5 mg | Japan | R, DB, PC | 82 | 57.2 | 57.2 | 7.9 | 4.7 | None | Luseogliflozin, 5 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Seino et al[25] | Japan | R, DB, PC | 155 | 59.3 | 73.4 | 8.2 | 6.3 | None | Luseogliflozin, 2.5 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Kashiwagi et al[26] | Japan | R, DB, PC | 151 | 56.2 | 74.2 | 8.3 | 6.8 | Pioglitazone | Ipragliflozin, 50 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-β |
Kashiwagi et al[27] | Japan | R, DB, PC | 240 | 59.7 | 65.8 | 8.4 | 10.5 | Sulfonylurea | Ipragliflozin, 50 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-β |
Kashiwagi et al[28] | Japan | R, DB, PC | 129 | 59.4 | 69.8 | 8.3 | 6.7 | None | Ipragliflozin, 50 mg/day | Placebo | 16 | HOMA-β |
Kashiwagi et al[29] | Japan | R, DB, PC | 168 | 56.7 | 58.9 | 8.3 | 7.7 | Metformin | Ipragliflozin, 50 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Liao et al[30] | China | R, DB, PC | 162 | 54 | 54.3 | 8 | Newly diagnosed | None | Dapagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR |
Wang et al[43] | China | R, DB, PC | 28 | 60.2 | 46.4 | 8.3 | Newly diagnosed | With or without metformin | Dapagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-β |
Terra et al[31]2; 5 mg | 7 countries | R, DB, PC | 233 | 56.6 | 55.8 | 8.1 | 5 | With or without metformin | Ertugliflozin, 5 mg/day | Placebo | 26 | HOMA-β |
Terra et al[31]2; 15 mg | 7 countries | R, DB, PC | 228 | 56.2 | 57.5 | 8.3 | 5 | With or without metformin | Ertugliflozin, 15 mg/day | Placebo | 26 | HOMA-β |
Dagogo-Jack et al[32]3; 5 mg | 12 countries | R, DB, PC | 233 | 58.9 | 56.2 | 8.1 | 9.7 | Metformin and sitagliptin | Ertugliflozin, 5 mg/day | Placebo | 52 | HOMA-β |
Dagogo-Jack et al[32]3; 15 mg | 12 countries | R, DB, PC | 229 | 59.2 | 57.6 | 8 | 9.3 | Metformin and sitagliptin | Ertugliflozin, 15 mg/day | Placebo | 52 | HOMA-β |
Eriksson et al[33] | Sweden | R, DB, PC | 40 | 65.3 | 78.6 | 7.4 | 6.6 | Sulfonylurea or metformin | Dapagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR |
Han et al[34] | Korea | R, DB, PC | 139 | 57.5 | 49.6 | 7.9 | 11.5 | Metformin and sitagliptin | Ipragliflozin, 50 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Hattori[35] | Japan | R, OL, PC | 109 | NR | 64.2 | 7.2 | NR | Sulfonylureas, metformin, or an α-glucosidase inhibitor | Empagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR |
Brown et al[36] | United States | R, DB, PC | 48 | 65.5 | 57.6 | 7.7 | 10 | Metformin, sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, or GLP-1 agonists | Dapagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 52 | HOMA-IR |
Chehrehgosha et al[44] | Iran | R, DB, PC | 72 | 51.1 | 40.3 | 8 | 6.2 | None | Empagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-IR |
Phrueksotsai et al[45] | Thailand | R, DB, PC | 38 | 59.2 | 31.6 | 8 | 5 | Metformin, sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors, or thiazolidinediones, | Dapagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR |
Cheng et al[37] | China | R, DB, PC | 124 | 71.5 | 53.4 | 7.7 | NR | Insulin, sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors, or metformin | Empagliflozin, 25 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR |
Gohari et al[38] | Iran | R, DB, PC | 82 | 62.8 | 41.1 | 7.9 | NR | Insulin, sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors, or metformin | Empagliflozin, 10 mg/day | Placebo | 26 | HOMA-IR |
Kwak et al[39] | Korea | R, DB, PC | 152 | 59.8 | 50.3 | 7.8 | 6.4 | None | Enavogliflozin, 0.3 mg/day | Placebo | 24 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
Yang et al[40] | Korea | R, DB, PC | 96 | 58.3 | 54.2 | 8.1 | 5.9 | None | Enavogliflozin, 0.3 mg/day | Placebo | 12 | HOMA-IR and HOMA-β |
- Citation: Chai SY, Zhang RY, Ning ZY, Zheng YM, Swapnil R, Ji LN. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors improve insulin resistance and β-cell function in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 107335
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i7/107335.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107335