Letter to the Editor
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2025; 16(6): 107017
Published online Jun 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i6.107017
Table 4 Comparison of nano-delivery systems applied in curcumol treatment
Delivery system
Composition
Mechanism of action
Retinal targeting efficiency
Advantages
Limitations
Conventional oral administrationRaw curcumol or tabletsAbsorbed via gastrointestinal tract, systemic distributionVery low; difficulty penetrating blood-retinal barrierConvenient administration, high patient complianceLow bioavailability, hepatic first-pass effect, insufficient retinal concentrations
Intravitreal injectionCurcumol solutionDirect ocular administration, high local concentrationHigh; direct targeting of retinaRapid onset, high local drug concentrationInvasive procedure, risk of complications, repeated injections needed
PLGA nanoparticlesPLGA, curcumolControlled-release system, extends drug half-lifeModerate; passive targetingFDA-approved, biodegradable, encapsulation efficiency > 90%Complex preparation, batch-to-batch variability
LiposomesPhospholipid bilayer, curcumolEnhanced cell membrane fusion and uptakeModerate; surface modifications possible for improved targetingCan carry both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugsLimited stability, strict storage conditions
Macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticlesMacrophage membrane, polymer core, curcumolInherits homing capability and immune evasion of source cellsHigh; specific recognition via membrane surface proteinsActive targeting to inflammatory sites, prolonged retentionComplex preparation technology, challenging scale-up production
DendrimersBranched polymers, curcumolHigh drug-loading capacity, controlled releaseModerate to high; modifiable with various targeting ligandsPrecise branched structure, multifunctionalityPotential toxicity, poor biodegradability