BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Nov 15, 2025; 16(11): 110007
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.110007
Table 3 Evolution of the concept of risk assessment in diabetes and Ramadan fasting
Phase
Timeframe
Approach
Representative sources
Dichotomy model Pre-1988Medical interpretations for religious commentaries “Fatwas”: To fast or not to fastAnecdotal medical translations of the general religious guidance: Fasting allowed vs not allowed from first safety principles
Medical model1988-2002Tripartite clinical categorization: Fasting allowed, relative/absolute contraindicationsSulimani et al[7], 1988; Kadiki et al[8], 1989
Narrative risk assessment2005-2020Risk tiers: Low, moderate, high, very high; qualitative criteriaAl-Arouj et al[13], 2005; Hassanein et al[14], 2017
Quantitative risk assessment2021-presentCalculator-based, point system with numeric thresholds and three categoriesIDF-DAR Risk Assessment Tool Hassanein et al[15], 2022
Validation2021-2025Multi-country evaluation and real-world utility testing of the IDF-DAR toolStudies from Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bangladesh, Oman, Sudan


Write to the Help Desk