BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2025; 16(10): 111813
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.111813
Table 1 Fracture risk estimates from the key cohort/meta-analyses of type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
Ref.
Design and population
Sample size
Fracture endpoint
Effect estimate (95%CI)
Diabetes type
Emanuelsson et al[29]United Kingdom Biobank + Copenhagen, Mendelian randomization + observational study507428Fragility fractureT1DM: HR = 1.50 (95%CI: 1.19-1.88); T2DM: HR = 1.22 (95%CI: 1.13-1.32)T1DM; T2DM
Zoulakis et al[1]Swedish elderly female cohort study3008Any fractureHR = 1.26 (95%CI: 1.04-1.54)T2DM
Champakanath et al[6]University of Colorado CACTI cohort1416Osteoporotic fractureHR = 1.08 (95%CI: 1.02-1.04)T1DM


Write to the Help Desk