©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2025; 16(10): 107640
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.107640
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.107640
Table 2 Advantages and limitations of echocardiographic (i.e., ultrasound) epicardial adipose tissue thickness measurement
| Advantages | Limitations |
| Non-invasive, easily done, cost-effective | No regional EAT measurement (e.g., atrial EAT) |
| Very little time consuming | Interobserver variability (especially in unexperienced investigators) |
| Simultaneous assessment of cardiac function | Non-ideal acoustic window |
| Reproducible | The lack of a reference range |
| Readily available for frequent follow-up | No volumetric assessment |
| Direct measure of visceral adiposity (rather than anthropometric measure) | No assessment of intramyocardial adiposity |
| Non-harmful | No EAT attenuation assessment (e.g., inflammation) |
- Citation: Đuzel Čokljat A, Grubić Rotkvić P, Čokljat D, Ferri Certić J, Babić Z. Epicardial adipose tissue in diabetic myocardial disorder: Role of echocardiography. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(10): 107640
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i10/107640.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i10.107640