Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Diabetes. Jul 15, 2022; 13(7): 553-565
Published online Jul 15, 2022. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i7.553
Table 2 Dual X-ray absorptiometry parameters and Fracture Risk Assessment tool scores in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes depending on trabecular bone score values
Parameter
Women with TBS > 1.31 (n = 53)
Women with TBS ≤ 1.31 (n = 43)
P value
TBS1.465 (1.39; 1.514)1.206 (1.127; 1.271)< 0.001
T-score, minimal0.0 (-0.5; 0.5)-0.2 (-0.6; 0.3)0.42
T-score, L1-L40.9 (0.1; 1.7)1.0 (0.1; 1.7)0.84
T-score, femoral neck0.1 (-0.2; 0.7)-0.05 (-0.5; 0.5)0.42
T-score, total femur1.3 (0.85; 1.6)1.3 (0.6; 1.8)0.97
T-score, radius0.3 (-0.3; 0.7)-0.05 (-0.7; 0.7)0.27
BMD, L1-L4 (g/cm2)1.278 (1.197; 1.387)1.317 (1.205; 1.39)0.86
BMD, neck (g/cm2)1.044 (1.011; 1.129)1.045 (0.968; 1.105)0.45
BMD, total femur (g/cm2)1.173 (1.099; 1.210)1.178 (1.088; 1.237)0.85
BMD, radius, (g/cm2)0.897 (0.849; 0.939)0.873 (0.816; 0.938)0.27
FRAX major (%)6.1 (5.7; 6.8)6.4 (5.7; 7.1)0.38
FRAX hip (%)0.1 (0.1; 0.3)0.3 (0.1; 0.4)0.08
FRAX major, TBS-adjusted (%)5.1 (4.6; 6.0)7.8 (6.9; 9.2)< 0.001
FRAX hip, TBS-adjusted (%)0.1 (0.0; 0.2)0.4 (0.2; 0.6)< 0.001