Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2021; 12(10): 1765-1777
Published online Oct 15, 2021. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i10.1765
Table 4 The distribution of genetic risk score in particular end-stage kidney disease subgroups
Group
GRS
P value
Post-hoc analysis
Classification: (1) GD, (2) TID, (3) VD, (4) CCD, (5) CP
0.09GD vs TIDP = 0.014
GD vs VDP = 0.12
GD (n = 146)0.628 ± 0.256GD vs CCDP = 0.61
TID (n = 16)0.461 ± 0.218GD vs CPP = 0.97
VD (n = 33)0.551 ± 0.269TID vs VDP = 0.24
CCD (n = 13)0.590 ± 0.138TID vs CCDP = 0.18
CP (n = 19)0.629 ± 0.298TID vs CPP = 0.051
VD vs CCDP = 0.64
VD vs CPP = 0.29
CCD vs CPP = 0.66
Classification: (1) GD, (2) TID+VD+CCD, (3) CP
GD (n = 146)0.628 ± 0.2560.055GD vs TID+VD+CCDP = 0.018
TID+VD+CCD (n = 62)0.536 ± 0.235GD vs CPP = 0.97
CP (n = 19)0.629 ± 0.298TID+VD+CCD vs CPP = 0.16
Classification: (1) GD, (2) TID+VD+CCD+CP
GD0.628 ± 0.2560.051N/A
TID+VD+CCD+CP0.558 ± 0.253