©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2019; 10(2): 114-132
Published online Feb 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i2.114
Published online Feb 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i2.114
Table 4 Assessment of study quality of randomised controlled trials
| Study | Criteria | Risk of bias | Study quality |
| Kuchay et al[11] | Random sequence generation | Low risk | Good quality |
| Allocation concealment | Low risk | ||
| Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
| Other bias | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
| Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | ||
| Ito et al[12] | Random sequence generation | Low risk | Fair quality |
| Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | ||
| Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
| Other bias | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
| Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | ||
| Shibuya et al[13] | Random sequence generation | Unclear risk | Fair quality |
| Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | ||
| Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
| Other bias | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
| Incomplete outcome data | Low risk | ||
| Eriksson et al[14] | Random sequence generation | Low risk | Good quality |
| Allocation concealment | Low risk | ||
| Selective reporting | Low risk | ||
| Other bias | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of participants and personnel | Low risk | ||
| Blinding of outcome assessment | Low risk | ||
| Incomplete outcome data | Low risk |
- Citation: Raj H, Durgia H, Palui R, Kamalanathan S, Selvarajan S, Kar SS, Sahoo J. SGLT-2 inhibitors in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. World J Diabetes 2019; 10(2): 114-132
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v10/i2/114.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v10.i2.114