©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 16, 2017; 9(1): 26-33
Published online Jan 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i1.26
Published online Jan 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i1.26
Table 4 Parameters of the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/risk factors for recurrence in patients with or without a history of recurrent common bile duct stones
| Variable | Recurrence group (n = 67) | Control group (n = 67) | P value |
| Stone size, mm | 11.0 ± 7.0 | 7.5 ± 4.5 | 0.007 |
| Stone number, n | 4.9 ± 4.4 | 4.3 ± 4.7 | 0.53 |
| CBD diameter, mm | 16.03 ± 6.1 | 12.0 ± 4.6 | 0.001 |
| CBD angulation method 1 (accumulative score) | 303.97 ± 34.41 | 304.84 ± 31.61 | 0.91 |
| CBD angulation method 2 (minimal angle score) | 137.03 ± 17.0 | 138.41 ± 14.18 | 0.71 |
| Difficult bile duct stones | 24 | 14 | 0.04 |
| Use of mechanical lithotripsy | 13 | 5 | 0.04 |
| No. of ERCP sessions required to clear the bile duct | 1.33 ± 0.6 | 1.34 ± 0.7 | 0.95 |
| More than one ERCP needed to clear the bile duct initially | 14 | 11 | 0.43 |
| Gallbladder in situ | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Periampullary diverticula | 25 | 16 | 0.066 |
- Citation: Konstantakis C, Triantos C, Theopistos V, Theocharis G, Maroulis I, Diamantopoulou G, Thomopoulos K. Recurrence of choledocholithiasis following endoscopic bile duct clearance: Long term results and factors associated with recurrent bile duct stones. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(1): 26-33
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i1/26.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i1.26