©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 10, 2016; 8(3): 128-142
Published online Feb 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.128
Published online Feb 10, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.128
Table 4 Theranostic markers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
| Marker (drug) | Countries | Patients with + marker | Staining | Median survival (mo) | HR | |
| Pancreatic cancer | SPARC[2] (nab-paclitaxel/ gemcitabine) | United States | 67 | 36 | +SPARC: 17.8 -SPARC: 8.1 | P = 0.0431 |
| hENT1 (Gemncitabine) | Canada[96] | 21 | Low hENT1: 12 | Low: 4 | 1 | |
| High hENT1: 9 | High: 13 | |||||
| Italy[158] | 83 | Low hENT1: 27 | Low: 8.5 | 4.21 | ||
| Inter: 28 | Inter:15.7 | |||||
| High hENT1: 26 | High: 25.7 | |||||
| United States[97] | 91 | Low hENT1: 39 | 2 | 0.51 | ||
| High hENT1: 34 | ||||||
| Belgium[98] | 45 | Low hENT1: 26 | Low: 13.3 | 4.31 (HR for death) | ||
| High hENT1: 19 | High: 18.7 | P = 0.0001 (OS) | ||||
| Japan[159] | 40 | Low hENT1: 26 | Low: 8 | P = 0.011 (OS) | ||
| High hENT1: 14 | High:25 | |||||
| Japan[160] | 55 | Low hENT1: 16 | Low: 11.8 | 3.15 (OS) | ||
| High hENT1: 39 | High: 24.9 | |||||
| Belgium | 243 | Low hENT1: 142 | 2 | 0.34 | ||
| France[86] | High hENT1: 92 | |||||
| Worldwide multicenter[99] | 177 | Low hENT1: 118 | Low: 6.1 | 1.147 | ||
| High hENT1: 59 | High: 5.2 | |||||
| England[161] | 176 | Low hENT1: 77 | Low: 17.1 | 0.6 | ||
| High hENT1: 99 | High: 26.2 | |||||
| Marker | Countries | CCA patients | % mutated | Type of mutation | Potential theranostic value | |
| CCA | EGFR[94,105,109,112] | United States, South Korea, Japan, Italy | 400 | 1-81 | G719S kinase activation | EGFR inhibitors |
| VEGF[108,162] | South Korea | 272 | 41.7-56.8 | Up-regulation | Anti-VEGF therapies | |
| Kras[109,111,142,163-166] | United States, Germany, China, Norway, Japan | 197 | 7.4-45 | Substitution | U0126 (MEK inhibitor) | |
| BRAF[109,110,164,167] | United States, Germany, China | 222 | 0-22 | Activating missense | BRAF inhibitors | |
| ErbB2 (HER2/neu)[94,112] | South Korea, Italy | 284 | 4-5.1 | Up-regulation | Anti-ErbB2 therapies | |
| IDH1/2[109,114,115,168] | United States | 576 | 10-22.31 | Gain of function | α-KG-mimics reverse methylation | |
| miR-21, miR-200b[40]; miR-29b, miR-205, miR-221[117] | United States, Japan | 1 | 1 | Up-regulated | Increased sensitivity to gemcitabine | |
| miR-494[92] | United States | 43 | 1 | Down-regulated | Up-regulation decreases tumor growth | |
| Panel: CDO1, DCLK1, ZSCAN18 and SFRP1[169] | Norway | 39 | 87 | Promoter methylation | Anti-methylation therapy | |
| Panel: CDO1, CNRIP1, SEPT9, and VIM[170] | 30 | 85 | ||||
| SFRP1[169,171-173] | Norway, United Kingdom, South Korea, Thailand | 255 | 59-83.6 | Promoter methylation | Tumor suppression with gene therapy (RNAi) |
- Citation: Viterbo D, Gausman V, Gonda T. Diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers in pancreaticobiliary malignancy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(3): 128-142
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i3/128.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i3.128