Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 25, 2016; 8(2): 77-85
Published online Jan 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i2.77
Table 3 Studies evaluating drug elution or coating to prevent internal failure
Ref.JournalStudy designStudy results
In vitro
Rees et al[17]Journal of Hospital Infection (1998)In vitroBZC and Teflon reduced the number of organisms attached to stents
- control (polyurethane)
- benzalkonium chloride (BZC)
- ePTFE (Teflon)
Cetta et al[18]The European Journal of Surgery (1999)In vitroHeparin and hyaluronic acid coating reduced biofilm development
5 stents - control (polyurethane)
5 stents - heparin + hyaluronic acid
Weickert et al[21]Advances in Medical Sciences (2011)In vitroStents coated with hydrophobin or both hydrophobin and heparin reduced clogging material scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
7 stents - control (polyethylene)
4 stents - hydrophobin (H)
3 stents - H + ampicillin/sulbactam
3 stents - H + levofloxacin
3 stents - H + heparin
Animals
Gwon et al[22]Acta Radiologica (2012)Canine modelCefotaxime did not prevent biofilm development (gross inspection, SEM images)
3 stents - control (ePTFE)
3 stents - 10% wt/vol cefotaxime
3 stents - 20% wt/vol cefotaxime
Humans
Farnbacher et al[19]Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology (2012)Randomized prospectiveHeparin is effective in preventing encrustation on stents (encrustation weighed)
13 stents - control (polyethylene)
13 stents (same patients) - heparin