Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jan 25, 2016; 8(2): 104-112
Published online Jan 25, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i2.104
Table 3 Case series on endoscopic ultrasound-guided abscess drainage
Ref.Location of abscesses/sizeRoute of drainageComplete resolution/complications
Mandai et al[40] (n = 4)Post-operative abscess/4.5 cm to 7.0 cmTG100%/none
Hadithi et al[41] (n = 8)Perirectal (n = 6), Perisigmoid (n = 2)/4.0 cm to 9.0 cmTR100%/none
Puri et al[42] (n = 30)Periprostatic (n = 4) Perirectal (n = 19) Perisigmoid (n = 7)/2.5 cm to 5.4 cmTR/TS93.4%/none Re-intervention 16.5%
Varadarajulu et al[43] (n = 25)Perirectal (n = 19), Perisigmoid (n = 6)/5.0 cm to 6.9 cmTR/TS96%/none Re-intervention 3%
Wehrmann et al[44] (n = 20)Para-esophageal (n = 15)/> 2 cmTE95%/mortality 7%