©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2016; 8(19): 709-715
Published online Nov 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i19.709
Published online Nov 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i19.709
Table 2 Predictors of severity of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography n (%)
| Mild to moderate pancreatitis (80) | Severe pancreatitis (22) | P-value | |
| Patient related factors | |||
| Median age (yr) | 52 | 30 | 0.0001 |
| Age | |||
| < 35 | 26 (32.5) | 14 (63.6) | 0.0001 |
| > 35 | 54 (67.5) | 8 (36.4) | |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 38 (47.5) | 6 (27.3) | 0.08 |
| Female | 42 (52.5) | 16 (72.7) | |
| Median serum bilirubin (mg%) | 14.1 | 9.9 | 0.3 |
| < 2 | 8 (50) | 8 (50) | |
| > 2 | 72 (85.7) | 14 (14.3) | 0.07 |
| Median CBD diameter (mm) | 10 | 9 | 0.0001 |
| < 10 | 42 (52.5) | 16 (72.7%) | |
| > 10 | 38 (47.5) | 6 (27.3%) | 0.0001 |
| Indication for ERCP | |||
| Malignant | 39 (97.5) | 1 (2.5) | 0.009 |
| Benign | 41 (66.1) | 21 (33.9) | |
| Type of papilla | |||
| Normal | 39 | 17 | 0.06 |
| Atrophic | 6 | 2 | |
| Pregnant | 0 | 2 | |
| Tumour | 4 | 0 | |
| Redundant | 9 | 3 | |
| Juxtadivericular | 15 | 1 | |
| Small | 2 | 0 | |
| Long | 2 | 0 | |
| Procedure related factors | |||
| No. of cannulation attempts | |||
| < 5 | 46 (57.5) | 12 (54.5) | 0.03 |
| ≥ 6 | 34 (27.5) | 10 (45.5) | |
| Median number of pancreatic cannulations | 2 | 4 | 0.0001 |
| < 3 times | 58 (72.5) | 2 (9.1) | 0.0001 |
| > 3 times | 22 (52.4) | 20 (90.9) | |
| Method of cannulation | |||
| Conventional | 58 (72.5) | 18 (81.8) | 0.07 |
| Precut | 22 (52.4) | 4 (18.2) | |
| Biliary sphincter balloon dilatation | |||
| No | 70 (87.5) | 16 (72.7) | 0.1 |
| Yes | 10 (12.5) | 6 (27.3) |
- Citation: El Nakeeb A, El Hanafy E, Salah T, Atef E, Hamed H, Sultan AM, Hamdy E, Said M, El Geidie AA, Kandil T, El Shobari M, El Ebidy G. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Risk factors and predictors of severity. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8(19): 709-715
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v8/i19/709.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v8.i19.709