Prospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2016; 8(19): 709-715
Published online Nov 16, 2016. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i19.709
Table 2 Predictors of severity of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography n (%)
Mild to moderate pancreatitis (80)Severe pancreatitis (22)P-value
Patient related factors
Median age (yr)52300.0001
Age
< 3526 (32.5)14 (63.6)0.0001
> 3554 (67.5)8 (36.4)
Sex
Male38 (47.5)6 (27.3)0.08
Female42 (52.5)16 (72.7)
Median serum bilirubin (mg%)14.19.90.3
< 28 (50)8 (50)
> 272 (85.7)14 (14.3)0.07
Median CBD diameter (mm)1090.0001
< 1042 (52.5)16 (72.7%)
> 1038 (47.5)6 (27.3%)0.0001
Indication for ERCP
Malignant39 (97.5)1 (2.5)0.009
Benign41 (66.1)21 (33.9)
Type of papilla
Normal39170.06
Atrophic62
Pregnant02
Tumour40
Redundant93
Juxtadivericular151
Small20
Long20
Procedure related factors
No. of cannulation attempts
< 546 (57.5)12 (54.5)0.03
≥ 634 (27.5)10 (45.5)
Median number of pancreatic cannulations240.0001
< 3 times58 (72.5)2 (9.1)0.0001
> 3 times22 (52.4)20 (90.9)
Method of cannulation
Conventional58 (72.5)18 (81.8)0.07
Precut22 (52.4)4 (18.2)
Biliary sphincter balloon dilatation
No70 (87.5)16 (72.7)0.1
Yes10 (12.5)6 (27.3)