Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 10, 2015; 7(6): 628-642
Published online Jun 10, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i6.628
Table 3 Use of metallic stents for endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections
Ref.PopulationStentDesignOutcome
SEMS
Talreja et al[17]18 patients with PFCsFCSEMS (biliary stent)Prospective cohort95% success
Belle et al[40]4 patients with WONPCSEMSCase series100% clinical success
Fabbri et al[41]22 patients with infected PFCsFCSEMS (biliary)Case series77% clinical success
Penn et al[39]20 with PFCsFCSEMS (biliary) with plastic pigtailCase seriesTechnical success 100%, clinical success 85%
Weilert et al[42]18 patients with PFCsFCSEMSCase seriesClinical success in 78%
LACSEMS
Shah et al[43]Pseudocyst and WON (n = 33)AXIOS (EUS guided in 30/33)Prospective cohort91% technical success, 93% resolution of PFC
Walter et al[44]46 patients WON and 15 pseudocystAXIOS stentProspective cohortTechnical success: 98%, clinical success: 93% in pseudocyst and 81% in WON
Gornals et al[45]9 patients with PFCsAXIOSCase seriesTechnical success in 88% and 100% clinical success
Itoi et al[46]15 patients with pseudocystsAXIOSRetrospective case series100% clinical success
Yamamoto et al[37]9 PFCs, 5 pseudocyst and 4 WONFCSEMS (Nagi stent)Retrospective case series77.8% clinical success
ESOPHAGEAL SEMS
Sarkaria et al[47]17 patients with WONEsophageal FCSEMSRetrospective case series88% clinical success