Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 7, Issue 17

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

ISSN

1948-5190

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 25, 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249
Published online Nov 25, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243

Table 4 Performance indicators of endoscopic submucosal dissection

No other complication apart from perforation and bleeding were observed.

Citation: Hon SS, Ng SS, Wong TC, Chiu PW, Mak TW, Leung W, Lee JF. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v7/i17/1243.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243

Hon SS, Ng SS, Wong TC, Chiu PW, Mak TW, Leung W, Lee JF. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs laparoscopic colorectal resection for early colorectal epithelial neoplasia. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(17): 1243-1249 [PMID: 26634040 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i17.1243]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.