©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2013; 5(9): 420-427
Published online Sep 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420
Published online Sep 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420
Table 3 Per-oral endoscopic myotomy experience: Series data
| No. of patients |
| No. of completed POEMs |
| Age (mean, yr) |
| Achalasia by HRM subtype |
| I |
| II |
| III |
| Esophageal dilation > 6 cm or sigmoid |
| Percent of patients who failed prior conventional achalasia treatment (Endoscopic balloon dilation, Botulinum toxin injection, Heller myotomy) |
| Pre/Post eckardt score (mean) |
| Percent of patients with clinical success at 3 mo (Eckardt score £ 3) |
| Myotomy length (mean, centimeter) |
| Percent of technical errors |
| Minor mucosal perforations requiring clip closure |
| Needle decompression of capnoperitoneum |
| Percent of adverse events |
| Surgical intervention/conversion |
| ICU or step down unit stay |
| Prolonged hospital stay > 5 d |
| Significant blood loss or blood transfusion |
| POEM related readmission |
- Citation: Friedel D, Modayil R, Iqbal S, Grendell JH, Stavropoulos SN. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: An American perspective. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(9): 420-427
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i9/420.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i9.420