Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2013; 5(10): 508-513
Published online Oct 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.508
Figure 3
Figure 3 Obvious aspiration pneumonia was not observed in any of the participating patients. A: Extent of salivary flow. The grade of extent of salivary flow was significantly lower in patients with the continuous suction mouthpiece (CSM) than in patients with the conventional mouthpiece (P < 0.001); B: Frequency of saliva suction. No suction events were observed in patients with the CSM, while 3/98 (3.1%) of the patients with the conventional mouthpiece required suctioning during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (P = 0.082); C: Number of choking episodes. Although not statistically significant, less frequent choking episodes were observed in patients with the CSM than in patients with the conventional mouthpiece (P = 0.084).