Review
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2011; 3(12): 256-260
Published online Dec 16, 2011. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v3.i12.256
Table 1 Summary of the accuracy, false positive and spillage rates of endoscopic tattooing for localization before surgery from previously published reports
AuthorsnSubstancesTechniquesMean intervalAccuracy (%)False positive (%)Invisible (%)Spillage (%)
Cho et al[9]96India inkNA6 d97.902.16.3
Fu et al[15]36India ink0.2 mL injected directly30.8 d860148.3
55India ink0.2 mL injected after 3 mL injection of saline solution17.6 d98021.8
Arteaga-González et al[16]21India inkTotal 0.2-0.5 mL of 90% India ink injected after 3 mL injection of saline solutionNA1000014.3
Park et al[17]63Spot1-1.5 mL injected after 1 mL injection of saline solution1 d (all)96.81.61.69.5
Feingold et al[18]50Spot1-4 mL tangentially injected into multiple sites distal to the lesions1 d (60%)88012NA
Conaghan et al[19]54SpotNANA70715NA
Hwang et al[20]20Spot0.5 mL injected after 0.5 mL injection of saline solution, 3 sites at 1 cm distal to the lesions3 d900105
Miyoshi et al[21]41Indocyanine green1 mL injected after 2 mL injection of saline solution4 d92.7 (100, ≤ 8 d)07.3 (> 9 d)2.4