Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2010; 2(6): 212-222
Published online Jun 16, 2010. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i6.212
Table 3 Major series on EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage
YearAuthorNAccess routeTechnical success - Drainage routeClinical successComplications
2009Brauer[26]8TG – TD7/8 (88%) - 3 TG, 1 TD, 3 TP4/8 (50%)No complications - Pain evaluation: non significant improvement
2007Tessier[43]3629 TG 7 TD33/36 (92%) - 26 TG, 7 TD25/36 (69%)5 (13%) - 2 severe (5%): hematoma, pancreatitis - 3 mild (8%)
Total or significant pain reliefStent dysfunction: 20 pt (55%) = 29 new endoscopic procedures
2007Kahaleh[44]1313 TG10/13 (77%) - 10 TG10/13 (77%) < score pain < pancreatic duct diameter = narcotic use2 (15%) - bleeding, perforation
2007Will[45]1212 TG9/12 (75%) - 5 TG, 4 TP- 5 pt (42%): pain relief, fistula closure - 4 pt: surgery - 3 pt: endoscopy6 (43%) - 2 severe (14%): bleeding, perforation - 4 mild (29%): pain
2004Mallery[16]44 TG1/4 (25%) - TP1/4 (25%)2 (50%) - mild pancreatitis - fever
2002Francoise[12]44 TG4/4 (100%)3/4 (75%)No complications