BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2026; 18(9): 125352
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.125352
Table 3 Late adverse events of indwelling lumen-apposing metal stents organized by mechanism
Mechanism
Affected domain
Specific events
Typical timing
Evidence and source
LuminalChannel patency and drainageFood impaction; sludge- or stone-related occlusion; recurrent cholecystitisAccumulates with longer dwell timeDrives recurrent cholecystitis and provides the rationale for coaxial pigtail placement and proactive cholecystoscopy[9,55]; recurrent cholecystitis in 3 of 75 patients[35], in 2 of 55 patients[50] and in 2 of 50 patients[44]; no significant difference by removal status[36]; pooled recurrence beyond 1 year 4.2%[45]
MuralStent-wall interactionTissue overgrowth; buried LAMS syndrome; delayed bleeding from flange erosionMore apparent with longer dwell timeMechanistically expected and informed by a dedicated adverse-event meta-analysis[46]; no cohort reports incidence as a primary endpoint; a completely buried stent was documented at 61.5 months[43]; a device with a lower apposing force showed a low rate of buried stent syndrome[23]
MechanicalLoss of appositionMigration into the gallbladder lumen or distal migrationEarly or lateMigration in 2 of 75 patients[35] and in 7 of 50 patients (14%) in a 3-year registry, in which every migration was asymptomatic[44]; frequently asymptomatic when the stent migrates internally


Write to the Help Desk