Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2026; 18(9): 124435
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.124435
Published online Sep 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.124435
Table 3 Factors associated with discrepancy between rapid on-site evaluation and final cytologic diagnosis
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
| OR | 95%CI | P value | OR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Tumor location (body) | 2.55 | 0.725-8.94 | 0.145 | 5.30 | 1.19-23.7 | 0.0291 |
| Lesion size < 20 mm | 1.46 | 0.450-4.72 | 0.529 | |||
| Trainee operator | 0.802 | 0.247-2.60 | 0.713 | |||
| FNA needle | 6.03 | 1.69-21.6 | 0.0058 | 7.85 | 1.94-31.8 | 0.0129 |
| 25-gauge needle | 1.18 | 0.365-3.84 | 0.777 | |||
| Suction with syringe | 5.30 | 0.649-43.2 | 0.120 | |||
- Citation: Murabayashi T, Yamada R, Kawaguchi S, Nose K, Satoh T, Nakagawa H. Impact of rapid on-site evaluation in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for resectable pancreatic body and tail cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(9): 124435
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i9/124435.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.124435