Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jun 16, 2026; 18(6): 118152
Published online Jun 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i6.118152
Published online Jun 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i6.118152
Table 1 Comparison of American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy criteria for difficult cannulation
| Parameter | ASGE | ESGE |
| Competence benchmark | ≥ 90% selective cannulation success rate | > 80% selective cannulation success rate for precutting |
| Definition of difficult cannulation | Not explicitly defined in ASGE guidelines; ACG 2026 quality indicators discuss difficult cannulation but without specific criteria | > 5 contacts with papilla OR > 5 minutes cannulation time OR > 1 unintended; pancreatic duct cannulation (5-5-2 criteria) |
| First-line technique | Guidewire-assisted technique recommended | Guidewire-assisted technique (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence) |
| Escalation strategy | Advanced techniques include double-guidewire, needle-knife sphincterotomy, transpancreatic sphincterotomy; endoscopists should be familiar with ≥ 1 advanced technique | Pancreatic guidewire-assisted cannulation with prophylactic pancreatic stenting; needle-knife fistulotomy preferred for precutting; transpancreatic sphincterotomy for small papilla with inadvertent pancreatic access |
| Rescue after failed ERCP | EUS-guided biliary drainage as alternative; percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; interval ERCP | Anterograde guidewire insertion via percutaneous or EUS-guided approach; EUS-rendezvous technique |
- Citation: Jain A, Pabba M, Jain A, Madhankumar S, Singh S, Chandan S, Hasan MK, Arain MA. Biliary cannulation techniques: Optimizing success and minimizing risk. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(6): 118152
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i6/118152.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i6.118152