Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. May 16, 2026; 18(5): 118389
Published online May 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i5.118389
Published online May 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i5.118389
Figure 2 Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography predictors of incomplete common bile duct stone clearance.
A-H: Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging of various predictors of incomplete common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance in A-D. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiographic images of various predictors of incomplete CBD stone clearance in E-H. Stone size greater than CBD diameter (A); proximal location of stone (B and C); impacted stone (D); stone size greater than CBD diameter (E); proximal location of stone (F and G); impacted stone (H).
- Citation: Lone SA, Vaithiyam V, Vora K, Sirohi N, Sonika U, Dalal A, Kumar A, Srivastava S, Sachdeva S, Sharma BC. Predictors of incomplete common bile duct stone clearance at index endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(5): 118389
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i5/118389.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i5.118389