Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2026; 18(4): 117976
Published online Apr 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i4.117976
Published online Apr 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i4.117976
Table 3 Phased clinical integration roadmap
| Phase | Primary goals | Key evidence required | Regulatory milestones |
| Phase 1 (1-2 years) | Low-risk auxiliary tasks (e.g., automated measurement, structured reporting) | Feasibility studies, human-machine interaction safety data | Registration or simplified clearance (e.g., class II medical device) |
| Phase 2 (3-5 years) | Moderate-risk diagnostic support (e.g., lesion detection and classification) | Multicenter diagnostic accuracy studies, clinical utility assessment | Moderate-risk device approval (requires performance monitoring plan) |
| Phase 3 (> 5 years) | High-risk autonomous functions (e.g., puncture path planning, real-time complication alert) | Large-scale RCTs: Real-world effectiveness data | High-risk device approval (requires a full post-market surveillance system) |
- Citation: Chen ZY, Wang YQ, Tan XZ, Liu P, Peng Y. Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasound: Clinical translation of a prediction, navigation, and diagnosis framework. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(4): 117976
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i4/117976.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i4.117976