Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2026; 18(3): 114327
Published online Mar 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i3.114327
Published online Mar 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i3.114327
Table 1 Endoscopic grading of acute caustic injury as per the Zargar’s classification
| Endoscopic grading | Findings |
| Grade 0 | Normal findings |
| Grade 1 | Edema and hyperemia of the mucosa |
| Grade 2a | Superficial localized ulcerations, friability, hemorrhage and blisters |
| Grade 2b | Deep ulcerations (either discrete or circumferential), in addition to friability, hemorrhage, and superficial ulcerations |
| Grade 3a | Small, scattered areas of necrosis |
| Grade 3b | Extensive necrosis |
- Citation: Singh AK, Birda CL, Kochhar R. Optimizing triage in acute caustic ingestion: Choosing between endoscopy and computed tomography. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(3): 114327
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v18/i3/114327.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v18.i3.114327