BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2026; 18(2): 113699
Published online Feb 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i2.113699
Table 3 Diagnosis, management plan, and survival status of patients, n (%)
Variables
Total (n = 77)1
EUS-FNB specimen
Mediastinal lesion/with esophageal/gastric lesion16 (20.8)
Mediastinal LN/with esophageal/pancreatic/spleenic mass42 (54.5)
Para-aortic mass/with gastric/duodenal lesion7 (9.1)
Porta hepatis LN/with gastric/duodenal/Liver/pancreatic lesion12 (15.6)
EUS-FNB tissue nature
Benign45 (58.4)
Malignant32 (41.6)
Definitive tissue diagnosis
Malignant
Lymphoma9 (11.7)
Adenocarcinoma8 (10.4)
Squamous cell carcinoma8 (10.4)
Metastatic carcinoma4 (5.2)
NETs/non-small cell carcinoma5 (6.5)
Benign
Anthracotic/silicotic nodule4 (5.2)
Esophageal candidiasis/gastritis 2 (2.6)
Sarcoidosis8 (10.4)
TB11 (14.3)
Reactive lymphoid tissue
16 (20.8)
Thymoma/solitary fibrous tumor2 (2.6)
Treatment
Anti-TB drugs10 (13.0)
Chemotherapy14 (18.2)
Conservative therapy22 (28.6)
Steroids/immunosuppressive therapy3 (3.9)
Palliative care5 (6.5)
PEG tube placement 3 (3.9)
Radiation therapy3 (3.9)
Surgical resection3 (3.9)
No treatment14 (18.2)
Patient’s outcome
Survived53 (68.8)
Deceased10 (13.0)
Loss to follow-up/LAMA14 (18.2)


Write to the Help Desk