BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2026; 18(2): 113699
Published online Feb 16, 2026. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v18.i2.113699
Table 2 Diagnostic modalities including endoscopic ultrasonography details, n (%)
Variables
Total (n = 77)
Initial diagnostic modality
CT scan61 (79.2)
PET CT16 (20.8)
Indication of EUS based on initial diagnostic findings
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy28 (36.4)
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy with esophageal/gastric/duodenal lesion8 (10.4)
Mediastinal lymphadenopathy with liver deposit/gall bladder/pancreatic mass15 (19.5)
Mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy/with liver deposits/pulmonary nodules17 (22.1)
Para-aortic lymphadenopathy/with esophageal lesion4 (5.2)
Porta hepatis lymphadenopathy/with breast/gastric/duodenal lesion5 (6.5)
Characteristics of lymph nodes/Lesion/mass
Size of lymph node1, mean ± SD1.9 ± 0.8 (range: 0.7-3.6 cm)
Size of lesion/mass1, mean ± SD5.9 ± 2.4 (range: 1.3 -9.4 cm)
EUS procedural duration1, mean ± SD28.1 ± 18.9 minutes
Needle type
22G74 (96.1)
25G3 (3.9)
Number of “needle” passes, mean ± SD2.1 ± 0.8
116 (20.8)
238 (49.4)
320 (26.0)
42 (2.6)
51 (1.3)
EUS diagnostic adequacy
Sufficient to conclude diagnosis73 (94.8)
Not sufficient to conclude4 (5.2)
EUS procedure-related complications
No77 (100.0)


Write to the Help Desk