©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2025; 17(9): 111734
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.111734
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.111734
Table 2 Clinical outcomes in the pretraction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional pretraction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection groups, n (%)
| p-ESD group (n = 49) | c-ESD group (n = 54) | P value | |
| Dissection time, minutes | 9.03 (7.0-12.3) | 14.9 (11.0-20.5) | < 0.0011 |
| En bloc resection | 49 (100) | 54 (100) | 1.000 |
| R0 resection | 49 (100) | 48 (88.9) | 0.0282 |
| Adverse events | |||
| Minor intraoperative bleeding | 5 (10.2) | 14 (25.9) | 0.040 |
| Major intraoperative bleeding | 2 (4.1) | 10 (18.5) | 0.0302 |
| Delayed bleeding | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.7) | 0.4962 |
| Muscularis propria injury | 0 (0.0) | 9 (16.7) | 0.0032 |
| Intraoperative perforation | 0 (0.0) | 3 (5.6) | 0.2442 |
| Delayed perforation | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
| Tumor recurrence | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | - |
- Citation: Guo XX, Zhang SH, Chen AJ, Chen YL, Chen FL. Efficacy and safety of pretraction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for treating rectal neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(9): 111734
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i9/111734.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.111734