©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2025; 17(9): 109396
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109396
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109396
Table 3 Comparison of average duration of procedure between starch-based polysaccharide solution and crystalloid-oil emulsion solution groups, n (%)
| Outcome | Starch-based polysaccharide solution group | Crystalloid-oil emulsion solution group | t-test/χ2 statistic | P value |
| Average duration of procedure (minute) | 96 ± 45.18 | 117 ± 57.57 | 2.76 (t-test) | < 0.01 |
| Intraprocedural bleeding requiring intervention | 10/99 (10.1) | 35/79 (44.3) | 27.21 | < 0.01 |
| En bloc resection | 32/99 (32.3) | 8/79 (10.1) | 12.43 | < 0.01 |
| 30-day adverse events | 2/99 (2.0) | 9/79 (11.4) | 6.66 | 0.01 |
- Citation: Kahlon S, Alsamman A, Desai J, Urayama S. Unsuspected efficacy of starch-based polysaccharide vs crystalloid-oil emulsion for lifting in colonic endoscopic resections. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(9): 109396
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i9/109396.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109396