BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2025; 17(9): 108420
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.108420
Table 4 Comparison of treatment outcomes between standard and advanced cannulation techniques, n (%)
Outcomes
Standard cannulation techniques (n = 314)
ACTs (n = 89)
P value
Cannulation success rate (%)99.7% (313/314)97.8% (87/89)0.68
Adverse events17 (5.4)20 (22.5)< 0.001
Hemorrhage3 (1.0) (mild)1 (1.1) (mild)0.633
PEP5 (1.6)9 (10.1)< 0.001
Mild/moderate/severe5/0/06/2/1-
Amy level, median (range, U/L)79 (9-2709)113 (20-2632)0.018
Elevated amylase9 (2.9)10 (11.2)0.003
Others00NA


Write to the Help Desk