©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Sep 16, 2025; 17(9): 108420
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.108420
Published online Sep 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.108420
Table 4 Comparison of treatment outcomes between standard and advanced cannulation techniques, n (%)
| Outcomes | Standard cannulation techniques (n = 314) | ACTs (n = 89) | P value |
| Cannulation success rate (%) | 99.7% (313/314) | 97.8% (87/89) | 0.68 |
| Adverse events | 17 (5.4) | 20 (22.5) | < 0.001 |
| Hemorrhage | 3 (1.0) (mild) | 1 (1.1) (mild) | 0.633 |
| PEP | 5 (1.6) | 9 (10.1) | < 0.001 |
| Mild/moderate/severe | 5/0/0 | 6/2/1 | - |
| Amy level, median (range, U/L) | 79 (9-2709) | 113 (20-2632) | 0.018 |
| Elevated amylase | 9 (2.9) | 10 (11.2) | 0.003 |
| Others | 0 | 0 | NA |
- Citation: Kaneko T, Kida M, Kurosu T, Kitahara G, Betto T, Saito Y, Koyama S, Nomura N, Kusano C. Early precut is useful for difficult bile duct cannulation, particularly in cases with long oral protrusion. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(9): 108420
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i9/108420.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.108420