Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2025; 17(7): 108264
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108264
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108264
Table 2 Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool for assessing the quality of the included studies
Ref. | Consecutive/random sample | Case-control design | Avoided inappropriate exclusions | Avoided patient selection bias | Index test interpretation bias | Reference standard classification | Patient flow bias |
Shiani et al[13] | Yes | Yes | Low | Low | Yes | Low | Yes |
Ma et al[1] | Unclear | Yes | Moderate | Low | No | Low | Yes |
Vere et al[14] | Unclear | No | High | Low | Yes | Low | No |
Trifan et al[15] | Yes | Yes | Low | Low | Yes | Low | Yes |
Cañadas Garrido et al[16] | Yes | Yes | Low | Low | Yes | Low | Yes |
Ooka et al[17] | Yes | Yes | Low | Low | Yes | Low | Yes |
- Citation: Gadour E, Miutescu B, Okasha HH, Ghiuchici AM, AlQahtani MS. Diagnostic yield of video capsule endoscopy vs simple balloon enteroscopy in small intestinal disorders: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 108264
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i7/108264.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108264