Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2025; 17(7): 107911
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911
Table 6 Comparative table of world-wide outcomes in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in proximal stomach
| Ref. | En bloc resection rate | Complete resection rate | Curative resection rate | Adverse events rate | Procedure time, mean ± SD (minutes) | Submucosal neoplastic invasion |
| Current study | 85.7 (42/49) | 73.4 (36/49) | 65.3 (32/49) | 2.0 (1/49) | 129.08 ± 63.91 | 14.2 (7/49) |
| Cho et al[28], 2023 | 100 (12/12) | 91.7 (11/12) | 83.3 (10/12) | 16.7 (2/12) | Not specified | Not specified |
| Kim et al[13], 2017 | 92.0 (46/50) | 88.0 (44/50) | 94.1 (16/17) | 4.0 (2/50) | 33 ± 18 | 17.6 (3/17) |
| Kang et al[27], 2017 | 92.5 (62/67) | 94.0 (63/67) | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | 22.9 (20/67) |
| Yoon et al[14], 2014 | 84.7 (83/98) | 80.6 (79/98) | Not specified | 13.3 (13/98) | 90.51 ± 58.06 | Not specified |
- Citation: Aliaga Ramos J, Arantes VN. Impact of gastric neoplasms location on clinical outcome of patients treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 107911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i7/107911.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911