BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2025; 17(7): 107911
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911
Table 5 Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection learning curve analysis for proximal stomach, n (%)

Phase I (16 cases)
Phase II (16 cases)
Phase III (17 cases)
P value
En bloc resection15 (93.7)14 (87.5)13 (76.4)0.296
Complete resection (R0)14 (87.5)11 (68.7)11 (64.7)0.540
Curative resection12 (75.0)10 (62.5)10 (58.8)0.540
Size (mean), mm17.2 (10-35)28.6 (15-40)32.7 (12-80)0.035
Procedure time, mean ± SD, minutes110.3 ± 52.8126.2 ± 63.6145.0 ± 67.20.348
Adverse events
    Overall adverse event rate005.8 (1/17)0.540
    Digestive bleeding005.8 (1/17)0.540
    Perforation0001
Histological type of lesions
    Benign neoplasms6 (37.5)5 (31.2)00.296
    Low grade dysplasia2 (12.5)2 (12.5)4 (23.5)0.540
    High grade dysplasia1 (6.2)2 (12.5)9 (52.9)0.296
Adenocarcinoma (according to depth of tumor invasion)
    Intramucosal 3 (18.7)5 (31.2)2 (11.7)1
    SM1 invasion1 (6.2)01 (5.8)1
    SM2 invasion3 (18.7)2 (12.5)1 (5.8)0.296


Write to the Help Desk