Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Jul 16, 2025; 17(7): 107911
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911
Published online Jul 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911
Table 2 Comparison of procedure time between both gastric segments according to lesion size and histological analysis
Procedure time, distal stomach (n = 99) (minutes) | Procedure time, proximal stomach (n = 49) (minutes) | P value | |
Neoplasm size | |||
< 30 mm | 83.04 ± 37.55 | 108.65 ± 44.58 | < 0.001 |
≥ 30 mm | 111.90 ± 44.00 | 154.76 ± 72.34 | < 0.001 |
Histological type of resected specimen | |||
Benign neoplasms | 90.88 ± 37.07 | 111.66 ± 44.47 | 0.002 |
Low grade dysplasia | 78.38 ± 24.30 | 96.87 ± 19.19 | < 0.001 |
High grade dysplasia | 92.72 ± 36.82 | 158 ± 78.07 | < 0.001 |
Adenocarcinoma | 112.62 ± 50.95 | 136.05 ± 67.44 | 0.017 |
- Citation: Aliaga Ramos J, Arantes VN. Impact of gastric neoplasms location on clinical outcome of patients treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 107911
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i7/107911.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911