©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Dec 16, 2025; 17(12): 111236
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.111236
Published online Dec 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.111236
Table 5 Comparative studies of multiple advanced endoscopic modalities for dysplasia detection in inflammatory bowel disease
| Ref. | Techniques compared | Study design | Key findings |
| Hlavaty et al[35], 2011 | SD WLE vs DCE vs CLE | Prospective cohort | Targeted biopsies are superior to random; DCE increased IEN detection; CLE did not add clinical benefit due to low evaluability of polypoid lesions |
| Iacucci et al[36], 2018 | HD WLE vs HD DCE vs VCE (iSCAN) | Multicenter RCT | No significant difference in neoplasia detection; VCE had the best lesion visibility and was the most time-efficient |
| Gasia et al[3], 2016 | HD WLE vs HD DCE vs HD CLE | Prospective observational | CLE combined with targeted biopsies provided the highest dysplasia detection rate, though more resource-intensive; random biopsies added little value |
- Citation: Pal P, Kata P, Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Soma PR, Gupta R, Tandan M, Duvvur NR. Advances in endoscopic dysplasia detection in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(12): 111236
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i12/111236.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i12.111236