©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2025; 17(11): 110024
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110024
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110024
Table 8 Studies that evaluated the incisional therapy for esophageal strictures
| Ref. | Number of patients | Etiology of stricture | Clinical success at follow-up | Follow-up duration (months) |
| Treatment naïve | ||||
| Burdick et al[44], 1993 | 7 | Schatzki ring | 85.7% | 36 |
| Disario et al[45], 2002 | 11 | Schatzki ring | 36% | 72 |
| Schubert et al[46], 2003 | 15 | Anastomotic strictures | 93% | 23 |
| Hordijk et al[47], 2009 | 31 | Anastomotic strictures | 67.7% | 6 |
| Lee et al[48], 2009 | 24 | Anastomotic strictures | 87.5% | 24 |
| Treatment refractory | ||||
| Brandimarte et al[49], 2002 | 6 | Anastomotic strictures | 36% | 24 |
| Simmons et al[50], 2006 | 9 | Anastomotic strictures | 44.4% | 14 |
| Hordijk et al[51], 2006 | 20 | Anastomotic strictures | 60% | 12 |
| Muto et al[52], 2012 | 32 | Anastomotic strictures | 62% | 12 |
| Tan and Liu[53], 2016 | 13 | Anastomotic strictures | 60% | 24 |
- Citation: Singh AK, Singh A, Kochhar R, Manrai M. Esophageal strictures: Management beyond dilation. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(11): 110024
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i11/110024.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110024