©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Nov 16, 2025; 17(11): 110024
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110024
Published online Nov 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110024
Table 4 It enumerates the difference between bougie and balloon dilators
| Feature | Bougie dilators | Balloon dilators |
| Mechanism of action | Apply axial/shearing force as they are pushed through the stricture | Apply radial/centrifugal force by expanding within the stricture |
| Force distribution | Longitudinal, may be uneven and less controlled | Radial and uniform, leading to symmetrical expansion |
| Need for endoscopic visualization | Not essential | Requires endoscopic access (TTS) or fluoroscopy |
| Need for guidewire | Required | May or may not require, depending on the type of balloon dilator |
| Cost | Generally lower (reusable) | Higher (disposable or limited reuse) |
| Procedure time | Shorter procedure time | Longer procedure time due to multistep inflation |
| Types | Savary-Gilliard (wire-guided) | TTS balloon |
- Citation: Singh AK, Singh A, Kochhar R, Manrai M. Esophageal strictures: Management beyond dilation. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(11): 110024
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i11/110024.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110024