Real-world topographical efficacy, procedural outcome and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection in colon segments

Table 4 Generalized linear model using logistic regression for histologically complete resection outcome

	Estimate	SE	P value	OR	OR (95%CI low)	OR (95%CI high)
Intercept	2.52	2.34	0.28	-	-	-
Age	-0.01	0.03	0.61	0.99	0.93	1.04
Gender	-0.96	0.52	0.07	0.38	0.14	1.06
Lesion length (mm)	-0.03	0.04	0.48	0.97	0.89	1.05
Lesion depth (mm)	0.01	0.17	0.93	1.01	0.74	1.45
EFTR duration (minutes)	0.00	0.01	0.86	1.00	0.99	1.02
Ascending colon vs reference1	0.39	0.76	0.61	1.47	0.32	6.59
Descending colon vs reference1	0.36	0.91	0.69	1.43	0.24	9.29
Cecum vs reference1	0.89	0.99	0.36	2.44	0.38	21.25
Sigmoid colon vs reference1	0.03	0.82	0.97	1.03	0.20	5.26
Rectum vs reference1	1.42	1.02	0.17	4.12	0.60	37.81

¹Reference (as determined by dummy coding): Transverse colon.

EFTR: Endoscopic full thickness resection; SE: Standard error of the estimate.