©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2025; 17(10): 112380
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.112380
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.112380
Table 3 Distribution of histologically complete resection and microscopic residual resection per section of the large intestine, n (%)
| Section | R0 | R1 |
| Cecum (n = 12) | 10 (83.3) | 2 (16.7) |
| Ascending colon (n = 25) | 21 (84.0) | 4 (16.0) |
| Transverse colon (n = 15) | 11 (73.3) | 4 (26.7) |
| Descending colon (n = 13) | 11 (84.6) | 2 (15.4) |
| Sigmoid colon (n = 17) | 13 (76.5) | 4 (23.5) |
| Rectum (n = 20) | 17 (85.0) | 3 (15.0) |
| Total (n = 102) | 83 (81.4) | 19 (18.6) |
- Citation: Albrecht H, Schaefer C, Stegmaier A, Gschossmann J, Hagel A, Raithel M. Real-world topographical efficacy, procedural outcome and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection in colon segments. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(10): 112380
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i10/112380.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.112380