©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Oct 16, 2025; 17(10): 112380
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.112380
Published online Oct 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.112380
Table 2 Categorized histology for lesions treated with endoscopic full thickness resection (n = 102)
| Frequency | Pro-tion (%) | Low grade IEN (n) | Low grade IEN (%) | High grade IEN (n) | High grade IEN (%) | |
| Tubular adenoma | 32 | 31.4 | 22 | 68.7 | 10 | 31.3 |
| Tubulovillous adenoma | 29 | 28.4 | 15 | 51.7 | 14 | 48.3 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 13 | 12.7 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 100 |
| Sessile serrated adenoma | 9 | 8.8 | 5 | 55.6 | 3 | 33.3 |
| Neuroendocrine tumor | 6 | 5.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Villous adenoma | 2 | 1.8 | 2 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 1 | 0.98 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100 |
| Other (malignant melanoma, lymphofollicular hyperplasia amyloidosis, etc.) | 10 | 9.8 | - | - | - | - |
- Citation: Albrecht H, Schaefer C, Stegmaier A, Gschossmann J, Hagel A, Raithel M. Real-world topographical efficacy, procedural outcome and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection in colon segments. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(10): 112380
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v17/i10/112380.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i10.112380