Real-world topographical efficacy, procedural outcome and safety of endoscopic full thickness resection in colon segments

Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the analysis population (n = 102), n (%)¹

Parameter
Age	70 (64-78)
Duration of EFTR (minute)	99 (88-115)
Gender
Male	64 (62.7)
Female	38 (37.3)
Location of lesion
Cecum	12 (11.8)
Ascending colon	25 (24.5)
Transverse colon	15 (14.7)
Descending colon	13 (12.7)
Sigmoid colon	17 (16.7)
Rectum	20 (19.6)
Lesion size (n = 102)
Length (mm)	20 (15-25)
Width (mm)	19 (13-24)
Depth (mm)	3 (3-4)
Histologically complete resection	81 (79.4)
Microscopic residual resection	21 (20.6)
Number of patients with ≥ 1 AEs to EFTR	33 (32.4)
Minor AEs to EFTR	44 (43.1)
Major AEs to EFTR	1 (0.98)
Section-specific frequencies of AE to EFTR in the analysis population (≥ 1 AE)
Cecum	5/12 (41.7)
Ascending colon	10/25 (40.0)
Transverse colon	12/15 (80.0)
Descending colon	8/13 (61.5)
Sigmoid colon	8/17 (47.1)
Rectum	2/20 (10.0)

¹Results for interval and ratio data are presented as median (interquartile range), nominal data are presented as absolute and relative frequencies, n (%).

AE: Adverse events; EFTR: Endoscopic full thickness resection.